Official John & Ken Voting Guide(& Powder Blue Report)

I agree with the guys on every recomendation except I am voting NO on all the bond measures.

Proposition 1A. Transportation Funding Protection—State of California (Legislative Constitutional Amendment – Majority Approval Required)
Should the California Constitution be amended to further protect the state sales tax revenues for transportation purposes from general-purpose use and require any funds borrowed to be repaid to the transportation fund?

John and Ken say YES Allan says YES too

Proposition 1B. Highway Safety, Traffic Reduction, Air Quality, and Port Security—State of Calfiornia (Legislative Bond Act – Majority Approval Required)
Should the state sell $19.9 billion in general obligation bonds to fund state and local transportation improvement projects to relieve congestion, improve movement of goods, improve air quality, and enhance safety and security of the transportation system?

John and Ken say NO Allan says NO as well

Proposition 1C. Housing and Emergency Shelter Trust Fund Act of 2006—State of California (Legislative Bond Act – Majority Approval Required)
Should the state sell $2.9 billion in general obligation bonds to fund housing for lower-income residents and development in urban areas near public transportation?

John and Ken say NO! NO! NO! An big emphatic NO from Allan!

Proposition 1D. Kindergarten-University Public Education Facilities—State of California (Legislative Bond Act – Majority Approval Required)
Should the state sell $10.4 billion in general obligation bonds to fund repair and upgrade of public schools, including kindergarten through grade 12, community colleges, and state universities?

John and Ken say NO Allan says just say No

Proposition 1E. Disaster Preparedness and Flood Prevention—State of California (Legislative Bond Act – Majority Approval Required)
Should the state sell $4.1 billion in general obligation bonds to finance disaster preparedness and flood prevention projects at the state and local levels?

John and Ken say YES Allan says NO to another bad bond

Proposition 83. Sex Offenders. Sexually Violent Predators. Punishment, Residence Restrictions and Monitoring—State of California (Initiative Statute – Majority Approval Required)
Should California amend existing laws relating to violent and habitual sex offenders and child molesters to increase penalties and monitoring?

John and Ken say YES (to override the Sacramento Legislature “pervert protectors”)
Allan says YES to this much needed measure

Proposition 84. Water Quality, Safety and Supply. Flood Control. Natural Resource Protection. Park Improvements—State of California (Bond Initiative Statute – Majority Approval Required)
Should the state issue $5.4 billion in bonds for a wide variety of projects related to water safety, rivers, beaches, levees, watersheds, and parks and forests?

John and Ken say NO Again I agree...vote NO

Proposition 85. Waiting Period and Parental Notification Before Termination of Minor’s Pregnancy—State of California (Initiative Constitutional Amendment – Majority Approval Required)
Should the California Constitution be amended to require notification of the parent or legal guardian of an unemancipated pregnant minor at least 48 hours before performing an abortion?

John and Ken say YES This is such a reasonable measure....Allan says vote YES

Proposition 86. Tax on Cigarettes—State of California (Initiative Constitutional Amendment and Statute – Majority Approval Required)
Should the state impose an additional tax of $2.60 per cigarette pack to fund new and expanded health services, health insurance for children, and expand tobacco use prevention programs?

John and Ken say NO! NO! NO! I call this the "Illegal Alien Emergency Room Subsidization Act...please vote NO NO NO!

Proposition 87. Alternative Energy. Research, Production, Incentives. Tax on California Oil Producers—State of California (Initiative Constitutional Amendment and Statute – Majority Approval Required)
Should California establish a $4 billion Clean Alternative Energy Program to reduce California’s oil and gasoline consumption by 25 percent through incentives for alternative energy, education, and training?

John and Ken say NO We need more taxes in this state like we need a plague...please just say NO

Proposition 88. Education Funding. Real Property Parcel Tax—State of California (Initiative Constitutional Amendment and Statute – Majority Approval Required)
Should the California Constitution be amended to levy an annual $50 real property tax on most parcels with the funds allocated to five K-12 education programs?

John and Ken say NO Another easy No vote reco from Allan

Proposition 89. Political Campaigns. Public Financing. Corporate Tax Increase. Campaign Contribution and Expenditure Limits—State of California (Initiative Statute – Majority Approval Required)
Should eligible candidates for state elective offices receive public campaign funding that is supported by new taxes on corporations and financial institutions, and should contribution limits be imposed on those candidates that do not receive public campaign funding?

John and Ken say NO I feel like David Spade in that Capital One ad...NO NO NO

Proposition 90. Government Acquisition, Regulation of Private Property—State of California (Initiative Constitutional Amendment – Majority Approval Required)
Should the California Constitution be amended to require government to pay property owners for substantial economic losses resulting from some new laws and rules, and limit government authority to take ownership of private property?

John and Ken say YES last but not least, Allan says to vote YES on this needed measure